5 Responses to “Global Cooling in Beaver City…”

1. admin says:

   February 20 at 9:38 pm

   Larry <no…@home.com> wrote in
   news:Xns9971E80B5B090noonehomecom@208.49.80.253:
   

   > In the Heartland of America, Beaver City has shown a 70 year history
   > of Global COOLING by .31C :
   > http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/data/ushcn/stationofth
   e
   > week .jsp

   > Oops….Where’s Algore when you want him??

   > Larry

   I just read "State of Fear" by Michael Chrichton.  It’s a fiction book
   backed up by a ton of science.  What was the last fiction book that you
   read that had 30 pages of bibliography?

   One of the many amazing facts that was discussed in the book was that
   urban warming (heating due to heating due to all of the roads,
   buildings, etc) plays a large part in the global warming debate.  As
   cities grow, the effect becomes larger and larger.  A large majority of
   the reporting weather stations around the country/world are in urban
   areas.  

   You need to compensate for this urban warming factor to come up with a
   plot of average temperature by year.  I never realized that anything
   other than the actual recorded temperatures was used in this
   calculation, but it is.  There’s a huge debate on how to calculate this
   factor and how large it is.  As a result the data which is being used
   isn’t pure, it’s adjusted.

   When you look at plots of non-urban areas, you actually see global
   cooling, but when you include all of the urban areas, you see global
   warming.

   This discussion really doesn’t belong in this news group and it was
   probably a mistake to reply.  But I’d suggest reading Crichton’s "State
   of Fear."  It was a good read, regardless of which side of the debate
   you come down on.  I had always assumed that global warming was a fact,
   but this book made me rethink my position.

   – Geoff
2. admin says:

   February 20 at 9:38 pm

   Glaciers are coming.  So is a carbon tax, and you have to ask "Why?"
   

   Government by whom?

   Terry K
3. admin says:

   February 20 at 9:38 pm

   Geoff Schultz <geoff"at"@geoffschultz.org> wrote in
   news:Xns99724789E6E25geoffschultz@216.196.97.136:
   

   > When you look at plots of non-urban areas, you actually see global
   > cooling, but when you include all of the urban areas, you see global
   > warming.

   One of the most interesting facts pointed out by the scientists in "The
   Great Global Warming Swindle", which is available in 8 parts on
   YouTube.com, is that the SURFACE, as you say, IS warming due to the
   destruction of the forests and replacements with urbana….however, there
   is a huge body of real evidence from the weather balloon records,
   satellite records, etc., that at 500′ the Earth is in a really measurable
   COOLING period.  The higher in the atmosphere you compare the
   measurements, the more the Global COOLING is evident.

   Of course, that doesn’t generate a Government Report or grant money.  It
   would also cause major embarrassment to the weather elite who’ve been
   "global warming" it for decades, now, causing all of us to pay billions
   of dollars for greenie stuff we didn’t need in the first place.

   Way too many scientists are living off "global warming" and its backlash.

   Larry
   —
   While in Mexico, I didn’t have to press 1 for Spanish.
   While in Iran, I didn’t have to press 1 for Farsi, either.
   While in Florida, I had to press 2 for English.
   It just isn’t fair.
4. admin says:

   February 20 at 9:38 pm

   On Jul 18, 7:43 pm, Larry <no…@home.com> wrote:
   

   > In the Heartland of America, Beaver City has shown a 70 year history of
   > Global COOLING by .31C :http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/data/ushcn/stationoft…
   > .jsp

   > Oops….Where’s Algore when you want him??

   Ya dit, its not "global warming." Thats an old/early phrase reproters
   used cause we the people are too stupid to undersatnd tecnical info.
   Its "global climate change." The republicans love the phrase global
   warming cause then they can go out and cherry pick any unusual cold
   spot. Then use that as support against global warming. its an old
   ploy: use an anomaly to act as a model. Sure parts of the place are
   getting warm. other cold, wetter, dryer. The point is…………….

   Bob
5. admin says:

   February 20 at 9:38 pm

   On Jul 20, 1:55 am, Bob <freya…@yahoo.com> wrote:
   

   - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

   > On Jul 18, 7:43 pm, Larry <no…@home.com> wrote:
   

   > > In the Heartland of America, Beaver City has shown a 70 year history of
   > > Global COOLING by .31C :http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/data/ushcn/stationoft…
   > > .jsp

   > > Oops….Where’s Algore when you want him??

   > Ya dit, its not "global warming." Thats an old/early phrase reproters
   > used cause we the people are too stupid to undersatnd tecnical info.
   > Its "global climate change." The republicans love the phrase global
   > warming cause then they can go out and cherry pick any unusual cold
   > spot. Then use that as support against global warming. its an old
   > ploy: use an anomaly to act as a model. Sure parts of the place are
   > getting warm. other cold, wetter, dryer. The point is…………….

   > Bob

   The point is: global ice age and a carbon tax.

   Too easy?

   Terry K